On 23/02/12 22:24, Willie WY Wong wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:55:07PM +0200, Penguin Lover Nikos Chantziaras 
squawked:
The PGO optimized build that Mozilla is shipping.  You can also build
with PGO from source, but that means building FF *twice* in a row (by
enabling the "pgo" USE flag).  I doubt that with the old laptop anyone
is building FF twice with PGO, and that means that the -bin package
should be faster.

Call me a sadist, but on my netbook I did build FF with +pgo.

I figured, if I was going to let it build overnight and more, why not?
:)

If you think it's worth the hassle, why not. Personally, the only reason I would build from source on such a slow system is to get a 64-bit build, since the -bin package seems to be 32-bit. That means the GUI is going to look like ass on AMD64 (due to lack of 32-bit versions of the Gtk theme engines.)

If you're on 32-bit to begin with, and you're building with "pgo" enabled, then my guess is that the performance compared to the -bin package is about the same. But as I said previously, this can be easily tested by running a browser benchmark, such as this:

  http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org

You could compare the results of the -bin package vs your self-compiled one.


Reply via email to