Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> [12-02-18 16:36]: > On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:16:37 +0100 > meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > > Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> [12-02-18 16:00]: > > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:37:24 +0100 > > > Alex Schuster <wo...@wonkology.org> wrote: > > > > > > > meino.cra...@gmx.de writes: > > > > > > > > > As this line in my previous posting states, museseq needs Qt > > > > > 4.*, which is installed...: > > > > > > > > > > configure: error: need qt >= 3.2.0 > > > > > > > > Um, huh? If it would need Qt 4.*, it would say that you need qt >= > > > > 4.something. But it says you need qt >= 3.2.0, so qt-meta > > > > 3.3.8b-r2 (which I have installed) would do fine. > > > > Oh, I just see that this is no longer in portage, my qt-meta:3 > > > > comes from the kde-sunset overlay. > > > > > > > > Maybe having Qt4 installed with the qt3support USE flag would > > > > work, but I doubt it. Qt4 is very different from Qt3. > > > > > > my understanding is that qt3support gives run-time support only > > > for apps built against qt3 but running under qt4 (i.e it's just a > > > simple run-time wrapper around API calls). > > > > > > But qt3support cannot be used to built against qt4 > > > > > > -- > > > Alan McKinnnon > > > alan.mckin...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > So, if QT3 is removed from protage, and museseq which still is in > > portage seems only to build agains qt3, I see a contradiction here... > > But media-sound/museseq is NOT in the portage tree. If you have it, > then it comes from an overlay, or from a local ebuild that you maintain. > > If museseq requires qt3, then the maintainer of the overlay (or you) > must provide qt3 or provide documentation about which overlay it is in. > > IIRC you can find qt3 in kde-sunset > > Either way it looks like a maintainer mistake > > > May be on my system there somewhere leftovers from ancient time, > > when qt3 needs some additional environment variables or such (?)... > > what would it be...where I can I look for such settings? > > > > -- > Alan McKinnnon > alan.mckin...@gmail.com > >
Ooops! Sorry, I was mislead by some numbering "[1]" is used for installs coming from pro-audio overlay and not "(1)" as I thought. Nonetheless, still wondering whats going on here... Still investigating... Best regards, mcc
