On Jan 15, 2012 10:33 PM, "Michael Orlitzky" <mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote:
>
> On 01/15/2012 08:36 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Virtualization is iffy if you're not careful which options you enable in
>>> the kernel.
>>
>>
>> I've been meaning to as a similar (but reverse) question - which I'll do
>> in a separate thread later, but...
>>
>> Your reference to 'virtualizationis iffy' above... do you mean if you
>> are going to run VMs on a hardened HOST? Or run a hardened machine as a
>> VM? I had a problem trying to switch my Linode VM to the hardened
>> profile, and ended up giving up on it...
>>
>
> I was talking about a hardened host. Fortunately, newer kernels will have
a preset "virtualization" profile that you can select to set only the safe
options. See this thread for the announcement:
>
>
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/msg_4bfe02921ffff3c94d7ee59cdf8f3f38.xml
>
> I personally have never run a hardened guest, but in that post he alludes
to the fact there may also be issues there, "...but in some
> cases applies even for the guest."
>
> In either case, you would want to stick to the stable kernels, since new
problems do crop up occasionally as new features are introduced.
>

I have been running hardened unstable kernels as guests on top of VMware
vSphere and XenServer without any problems.

Except for that one time where something went horribly wrong, rendering
*everything* unusable. But that kernel was withdrawn and replaced with a
new revision within 24 hours.

Of course, YMMV.

Rgds,

Reply via email to