Am Samstag, 7. Januar 2012, 12:20:08 schrieb Jeff Cranmer: > On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 10:11 -0500, Jeff Cranmer wrote: > > > > > What am I missing? > > > > > > > > have you set the type to linux raid autodetect? > > > > > > > > have you tried mdadm --assemble? > > > > > > mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 didn't make any difference. > > > Where do I set the type? > > > > after assembling, > > results of cat/proc/mdstat > > personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > > [multipath] [faulty] > > md0 : inactive sdb1[0](S) sdd1[3](S) sdc1[1](S) > > > > 4395409608 blocks super 1.2 > > > > unused devices: <none> > > > > results of mdadm --detail /dev/md0 > > mdadm: md device /dev/md0 does not appear to be active. > > > > results of /etc/init.d/mdadm status > > > > * status: started > > > > fstab line > > /dev/md0 /data xfs noatime 0 0 > > > > Is there a raid option I need to add to the fstab entry? > > Is there another service that needs to run, other than mdam? > > > > Thanks > > > > Jeff > > I tried changing the type of each array element in fdisk to fd (linux > raid autodetect. > > The array is still not being recognised at boot, with the same 'cannot > read superblock' error. > > I also tried re-running mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 > --raid-devices=3 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 > I get the error > mdadm: device /dev/sdb1 not suitable for any style of array. > > What is going on here?
I am thinking ;) -- #163933
