Am 13.12.2011 00:25, schrieb Alan McKinnon: > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:23:16 +0100 > Florian Philipp <li...@binarywings.net> wrote: > >>> Same here. All my server VMs work just fine with parallel enabled. >>> There's nothing complex in them, they tend to be single-service >>> machines. >>> >> >> Don't tell me you reboot your servers so often that it is necessary to >> tune the boot process for every last second. And please tell me you >> make the time slots for scheduled reboots large enough for trouble >> shooting, thereby not requiring every last second, either. > > I think you misunderstand me. I basically said: > > "Parallel init out the box? Works for me." > > I said nothing else. Especially not that I test it often, that I need > it, that I know exactly what I'm going to do with the 3 seconds I save > or anything else other than one single data point in the discussion > about problematic parallel init - that it works for me with simple > setups. > >
Yeah, and this was not meant as an attack specifically to you. Sorry if it sounded somewhat harsh. The issue (as stated by James) is: Is it worth putting in effort to keep this feature? My answer is: Probably not, for the given reasons. Regards, Florian Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
