On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2011 10:38 PM, "Michael Mol" <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: >> >> > Won't file a bug report, though. I have a feeling that my bug report re: >> > emerge failure will be marked WONTFIX thanks to the 'ricer special' >> > CFLAGS >> >> The CFLAGS you showed me weren't any more ricer than "-O2 >> -march=native". (I didn't know that -D_FORTIFY=2 came from gcc) >> >> They wouldn't have a leg to stand on... >> > > Mine is: > > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -floop-interchange > -floop-strip-mine -floop-block -funsafe-math-optimizations > -fexcess-precision=fast" > > If you tell me that's not a ricer's CFLAGS, then you've just made me a very > happy cat :-) > > Rgds, >
I wonder if someone in this thread will help me understand the term 'ricer'. The only origin I know of this term, from the car world, is really pretty racist, so I wonder if there isn't a more genteel origin I simply cannot find using Google? - Mark
