On Sun, Nov 27 2011, Dan Johansson wrote:

> On Sunday 27 November 2011 02.02:54 Paul Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Allan Gottlieb <gottl...@nyu.edu> wrote:
>> > In the last day or two wicd broke badly due to a net-tools upgrade.
>> > 
>> > The recommended workarounds are to specify USE=old-output
>> > for net-tools or to downgrade net-tools one version (I am ~amd64).
>> > 
>> > Neither of these have helped me.  Wicd cannot start either the
>> > wired or wireless interface.
>> 
>> I have no solution, but just a "me too" that wicd-based networking
>> stopped working entirely after I emerged some updates a couple days
>> ago. My short-term "solution" was just stop wicd and use the old-style
>> net init script instead since I haven't had time to research any this
>> weekend yet.
>
> I had the same issue after upgrading net-tools, wicd stoped working.
> While googling for a solution I found a workaround: Use the "ioctl" backend 
> instead of the "external" backend.
> For me this workaround works.

Thanks for the comments.  I did the changes suggested in the bug report
(downgrade net-tools or specify USE=old-output).  This changed the
behavior, but it was far from perfect.

The next morning, however, after no hardware/software changes but after
our thanksgiving guests (plus their laptops, phones, and ipads) left,
wicd is working pretty well on both affected machines.  I was nowhere near
the 50 dhcp connection limit, but perhaps the extra radio transmissions
were hurting.  Anyway now one machine has the downgraded net-tools, the
other USE=old-output and both seem to work.

This was definitely not fun.  Now for a really scary thought.  I just
let portage put gnome 3 on my "extra" laptop.  That machine has a fresh
fairly minimalistic desktop/gnome install.  Light testing shows gnome-3
works as advertised.  Do I dare put it on my real laptop?  I am tempted
to wait until intersession so as not to hinder preparing for my
lectures; but I worry about letting a system go 1 month without updates.

allan

Reply via email to