On Oct 4, 2011 11:30 AM, "Michael Mol" <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: > > Hello people! > > > > Now, I have the same question as this guy: > > > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66651 > > > > I.e., what is the most robust filesystem for Linux? > > > > The box will be used as a gateway/firewall for a branch office, so I really > > couldn't care less about filesystem performance. But the utility power there > > is horrendous, so I need something that can shrug off a catastrophic power > > loss, and/or very fast fsck. > > ISO9660? Read-only, error correction, and have logging go over the > network to something else. > > (Well, ISO9660 isn't required; any read-only media with a read-only > filesystem would probably do.)
Indeed that thought occurred in my mind. But I still need to keep some logs, and have read-write access to /etc Rgds,
