On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Sebastian Beßler <sebast...@darkmetatron.de> wrote: > Am 15.09.2011 16:57, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: > >> with an initramfs you will be able to do anything, so it will make no >> sense to keep supporting initramfs-less systems. > > With "Microsoft Windows" you will be able to do anything, so it will > make no sense to keep supporting "Microsoft Windows"-less systems.
Irrelevant: see the name on the list? It's called Gentoo Linux. I know you are trying to be witty, but only shows you are comparing apples and oranges. > With Gnome you will be able to do anything, so it will make no sense to > keep supporting Gnome-less systems. > > With Emacs you will be able to do anything, so it will make no sense to > keep supporting Emacs-less systems. Last time I checked, neither GNOME nor Emacs demanded that Gentoo developers or users had to write a fork/replacement for a core component of the system. GNOME and Emacs just need ebuilds and adapting their configuration to Gentoo-isms. Testing and bug reporting, as usual. The only code needed is some small patches for both and around 200 lines of emacslisp for site-gentoo.el. Again, not witty, just not very informed. Regards. -- Canek Peláez Valdés Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
