On Thursday, 15. September 2011 11:03:09 Michael Mol wrote: > > Yes, except that udev ONLY handles kernel-events and doesn't process any > > "actions" itself. > > These are placed on a seperate queue for a seperate process. > > The problem with this is that you now need to manage synchronization > between the kernel event processor and the action processor, which is > actually more complicated than keeping them together in a > single-threaded, single-process scenario.
Yes, it's more complicated to do. But not impossible. IPC, shared memory and what not, exists for a reason Best, Michael
