Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 16:43:39 schrieb Alan Mackenzie: > Is that right? How about it being saner to conform to standardised > interfaces, protocols and formats?
How about IPP? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Printing_Protocol Oh wait... that's what cups is using. > No, the sane alternative is to use the `lpr' command, possibly augmented > by special arguments for particular spoolers, but always having a > fallback to standard `lpr'. That way, everybody's happy. Even me. ;-) How about the lpr command provided by cups? Does it not work for you? Michael
