Todd Goodman wrote:
* Dale<rdalek1...@gmail.com> [110622 16:41]:
Matthew Finkel wrote:
[...]
Do correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't blas-reference pulled in by
merging gcc with USE="fortran"? Or did you install blas-reference for
another reason?
No clue. I just -c'd some stuff and kept running revdep-rebuild and
emerge -uvDNa world until it all got sorted. It took a few times but I
finally got a clean result.
The funny thing is this. I removed about 3 packages but had to install
close to a dozen to satisfy what was missing. Cantore, or something
like that, was left with no backend when I removed R.
So, removed some bloat then installed some more bloat. Ain't that a peach?
Dale
:-) :-)
No actually blas-reference fails to build unless gcc is built with the
fortran use flag enabled (since there's no fortran compiler available.)
The deps pulling in blas-reference are in my previous mail.
Todd
Maybe we have something different then. I don't have blas-reference on
here anymore either. My point was, disabling fortran to remove it only
lead to other stuff being required. I think there is more on here now
than there was before. So, removing fortran to get rid of bloat didn't
help any because it just required a different set of bloat.
Dale
:-) :-)
