On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:30:02PM +0200, Mike Edenfield wrote: > On 6/1/2011 5:47 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 11:31 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Indi did > > opine thusly: > > > >> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:00:01AM +0200, Peter Humphrey wrote: > >>> Personally, I'd be livid if portage were to remove my carefully crafted > >>> work from time immemorial, without so much as a by-your-leave. Anyone > >>> who wants to delete his own work is free to do so, but the rest of us > >>> ought not to be required to suffer it. > >> > >> Doesn't matter to me, my longstanding rsync habit ensures there are > >> always a couple of copies of my last known good configuration. > >> Doesn't your carefully crafted work from time immemorial deserve > >> rsync too? [cue rsync jingle] > >> > >> :) > > > > That's like saying that just because I have panel-beating skills and lots > > of > > scrap metal in the back yard that it's perfectly OK for marauding gangs of > > thugs to have at my car in the parking lots with baseball bats. > > Best analogy ever.
Hardly, though it does have a lot of drama which is what matters to some. :) -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤