Apparently, though unproven, at 01:48 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Peter Humphrey did opine thusly:
> > It's quite simple logic... If a file is modified, it is no longer the > > file portage installed, so portage does not uninstall it. If anything, > > the problem is that the logic used by portage is too simple. > > I don't think it's too simple. It seems exactly right for the task to me: > clear, predictable and easily understood. And completely consistent with the philosophy of Gentoo, where the user is in complete control and must make the hard decisions. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com