On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:20:01PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> 
> and have you ever heard of 'code reuse' or 'modularity'?
> 
> It seems - no.
> 
> Because KDE itself might be huge. But once loaded the apps are pretty small - 
> because they reuse code. kmail does not have its own html engine. It does not 
> matter where you type your text etc pp.
>

I'm sorry, but the "once you load this GB of libs" argument is 
missing the point entirely...

> Overall KDE uses LESS ram then most 'lightweight' solutions.
>

No. 

Been around the block investigating this, it's BS.
I've investigated this quite thoroughly because I have to support 
users who need everything to be easy and automatic and pointy-clicky 
(and preferably shiny too). 

Frankly, arguing that kde4 is a "lighter weight" solution is something 
only a hardcore zealot or someone who's not used a WM without a DE could do 
with a straight face.

-- 
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ 

Reply via email to