On Sunday 03 April 2011 15:13:09 luis jure wrote:
> on 2011-04-03 at 10:47 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >It's been done on a C-64, but I think a 3.5KB box with no mass storage
> >might be a little too challenging.
> 
> 3.5? wow, i always thought that the name meant it had 20K... like the C64
> and C128. but no. now, almost 30 years later, i learn that it had 5K, 1.5
> of them used by the system (you wouldn't want to leave the system without
> ram, would you?)
> 
> i never had a vic-20 (my first computer was the atari st-1040 in 1988),
> but a friend of mine had one in the early 80's and i always wondered at
> all the things you could do with the thing. i couldn't program, so i used
> to sit next by him telling him my ideas for a program for algorithmic
> composition, that he tried to code.

Nice, a walk down memory lane :)
The first computer we had at home (apart from an IBM my dad borrowed a few 
times) was an Atari 1040 ST.
We got it in 1986 and I can't even remember all the things I did with it.
It came with a copy of GFA Basic. This was a bit like C or Pascal, but then 
with Basic commands.
No line numbers, a decent editor and a compiler and linker. I could mix 
machine-code, basic-code and C-code into a final program to get a faster 
result.

The machine still worked last time I tried it and is currently still stored at 
my parents with strict instructions not to throw it away :)

--
Joost

Reply via email to