On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Daniel Tihelka <dtihe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Mark Knecht <markkne...@gmail.com> wrote: <SNIP> >> >> What do you see in glxgears? >> > I see this: > Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be > approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
I get this same message on my Intel graphics machine, and I get the same frame rates which is what the message says... > 273 frames in 5.0 seconds = 54.532 FPS > 299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.634 FPS > 301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.037 FPS > 288 frames in 5.1 seconds = 56.852 FPS > 212 frames in 5.0 seconds = 42.366 FPS <-- window maximized from here > 222 frames in 5.0 seconds = 44.352 FPS > 216 frames in 5.0 seconds = 43.021 FPS > 205 frames in 5.0 seconds = 40.716 FPS > > It is not so much and I don't know if it is the top performance of the > gallium driver (btw, I really believe it has large potential), or if it > could be improved further more (e.g. by compilling lvm into it), but it is > not critical for me now. > Dan > My ATI doesn't have the 'Running synchronized to the vertical refresh' message. It does about 200FPS. On my wife's box I used the closed source nvidia driver and get about 2500 FPS. - Mark
