Hi, If you don't use a UPS, what you want is journaling file system that is configured to do a lot of syncing. However, the syncing will make writing really slow.
Ext4 has the latest features. Especially, if you want to use an SSD. To really be reliable you must use a UPS which can signal when a clean shutdown is needed. Not having one is just asking for grief. With this functionality, you will not need the excessive syncing and writing can be fast. Additionally, if you don't have the cleanest power, having a UPS will extend the life of the hard drive and potentially the rest of the system as well as eliminating apparently random data corruption. I very much like the CyberPower Intelligent LCD Series. It has a USB connection which works with sys-power/nut and an LCD display. -Arthur On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 14:12 -0600, Dale wrote: > Hi, > > I'm planning to build a rig like mine for my brother before to long. I > know there are lots of opinions on the net but want some personal > experience information on this. My brother does not have a UPS. I may > can talk him into getting one but not sure. What is a good file system > that recovers well from a improper shutdown? I use ext2, ext3 and > reiserfs here but never had a power problem, except when hal broke my > stuff. I know XFS is not good for this already from my own personal > experience. > > Does anyone here have any personal experience on this? Just a 'I use > this and had a power failure and it powered up fine with no data loss' > would be nice. If this happened a lot and still worked, that would be > even better. > > I'm not looking to start a turf war. This will be a plain old desktop > so it doesn't need a fancy file system, just one that recovers from a > power failure. > > Thanks. > > Dale > > :-) :-)
