On 8/12/2010, at 6:29am, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> I'm usually slow at updating my gentoo machine, and I think I was
>> behind by about a month from last update. Anyways, I noticed that the
>> recent pambase-20101024 has pam_permit optional on for auth, account
>> and password in /etc/pam.d/system-auth.
>> 
>> That didn't sound real neat, so Iooked it up in the manual and it says
>> "very dangerous, use with extreme caution."
> ...
> 
> The pam maintainer usually blogs about his changes:
> 
> http://blog.flameeyes.eu


I read a little because I was interested.

To be more specific, this entry mentions pam_permit:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2010/10/24/new-pambase-choices

This entry seems to suggest that Portage makes automated /etc configurations 
problematic:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2010/04/29/pambase-is-not-that-free

Stroller

Reply via email to