Apparently, though unproven, at 05:47 on Thursday 18 November 2010, Stroller did opine thusly:
> On 18/11/2010, at 1:46am, Grant Edwards wrote: > >> ... > >> Looks like the *actual* problem is non-application of OYFEAL[1],not what > >> the devs do. > > > > Google doesn't seem to know what OYFEAL means. Do we get any hints? > > Yes, if you're patient he'll give you [1]. Note to self: stop composing mails at 3 in the morning. So it *should* have gone like this: ====== Looks like the *actual* problem is non-application of OYFEAL[1],not what the devs do. <insert arb stuff here> [1] Open Your F*cking Eyes And Look ====== It's an old hangover from my bench techies days when I had juniors who insisted on assuming they knew the cause of a problem even before they'd taken the covers off the faulty unit -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
