On 2010-11-15, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 17:31 on Monday 15 November 2010, Grant
> Edwards did opine thusly:
>
>> On 2010-11-14, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Finally, if xorg-server-1.8 is around the corner to be stabilised I
>> > suggest that you unmask it and use the xorg.conf file that we all
>> > know and love. :-)
>>
>> Using xorg.conf with 1.7 is simple enough (it's what I do on all my
>> other machines). That's why I don't understand why the Gentoo
>> developers decided to use HAL by default when it seems to be widely
>> acknowledged to be such a disaster.
>
> The Gentoo devs made no such decision.
>
> Upstream did.
>
> Gentoo closely tracks upstream, unless upstream is completely broken.
> HAL might be a crock of chit, but it does not render X broken and not
> usable.
Whether Xorg uses HAL or not is controlled by a USE flag isn't it? So
upstream choses the defaults for USE flags?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! My BIOLOGICAL ALARM
at CLOCK just went off ... It
gmail.com has noiseless DOZE FUNCTION
and full kitchen!!
