On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 21:21, Neil Bothwick <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:11:42 +0300, Fatih Tümen wrote: > >> I agree putting -hal is not a good idea unless you dare to break the >> packages that need hal. But I think there is a third option here > > Packages that need hal won't have a hal use flag. >
True, not every package that needs hal has hal use flag. I should have made clear that my implication was those which have (optional) dependency on hal && (thus) has hal flag. For packages that need hal it doesn't matter whether you have -hal in your make.conf anyway, does it? -- Fatih > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > Oxymoron: Reagan memoirs. >
