On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:29:30 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> > Although, perhaps I'm missing something but doesn't alpha
> > come *before* release candidate?  :)  
> 
> 
> Yes, but:
> 
> 2.2.0_alpha1 comes *after* 2.2_rc99

It should also come after 2.2, but I appear to have missed that release.

99 release candidates and then no release is something of an
anti-climax :(


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Eye of newt, toe of frog, regular Coke and fries to go, please.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to