On 10 September 2010 10:25, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you have the package listed in the unmask or keyword file? If so, it > ignores the mask file. Actually, I think it reads mask first then the > others.
Ah! Yes, I do. That explains why package.mask is being ignored, I guess, but I can't think of a way yet to prevent the downgrade. Removing from package.unmask just creates errors and adding 4.5.1-r1 didn't seem to have any effect. Any ideas?
