In <aanlkti=c4gb3gub=3zeedak-d6n9sjrexc6o2dhxv...@mail.gmail.com> petri.rosenst...@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Petri_Rosenstr=C3=B6m?=) writes:
Hello, does it work with a CPU that does not have the svm (I run on AMD)? Konstantin >Hi, >if you are not afraid of the command line I would recommend KVM. I use >it for my virtualization needs. When you don't want the sdl window you >may use the -vnc switch. -daemonize switch is great for running in the >backgroud. the -balloon switch is great for memory savings, I >recommend KSM in your kernel also. >Petri Rosenstr=C3=B6m >On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Bill Longman <bill.long...@gmail.com> wrot= >e: >> On 08/27/2010 12:58 AM, Konstantinos Agouros wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am currently running a guest with VMware-Server-1. However the modules >>> needed for that on the host are no longer supported and I am stuck with = >2.6.31 >>> for the moment. >>> So I am thinking of alternatives. My requirements: >>> >>> It should only need as much RAM on the host as needed (so XEN with stati= >c >>> assignment is out) >>> >>> It should run headless (I don't want a window on the desktop but be able >>> get console access when needed). >>> >>> VMWare import/compatibility would be nice but is not a must have. >>> >>> I use VirtualBox on a Mac but can it run headless? Any other proposals? >> >> VBox runs great headless. I start three VMs at boot time, all over VRDP. >> Highly recommended. You can migrate it to other systems if you want, too. >> >> -- Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: elw...@agouros.de Altersheimerstr. 1, 81545 Muenchen, Germany. Tel +49 89 69370185 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Captain, this ship will not survive the forming of the cosmos." B'Elana Torres
