On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 12:52 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > But seriously - 600 to 1892? That can not look good.
I was going to make the same comment, along with the obligatory "who actually spends time looking at their wallpaper change?" Nevertheless, I think you're on the mark. Such as significant scaling, I'm not surprised. The OP should scaling them manually (inside an image editor, e.g.)
