On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:26:14 +0200 Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rudmer van Dijk schreef:
> >
> > Holly: eix is probably not it, since it looks like it does not show the
> > availability of the package (masked+keyword), but thanks for the suggestion!
> >
> > Rudmer
>
> Actually, it most certainly does; keyworded packages are shown in brown
> with a ~ in front, masked packages are listed in red with a [M] in front.
>
> Of course you can use what suits you best; just wanted to clear up the
> misconception.
>
> Holly
I haven't seen anyone post this script as yet. It's by ciaranm and is
very useful when people ask on irc why a certain package version can't
be installed on their arch.
Sample output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ 0 0.67 $ eshowkw
gnome Keywords for gnome-base/gnome:
| a a a h i m m p p p p s s s x x x x
| l m r p a 6 i p p p p 3 h p 8 8 8 8
| p d m p 6 8 p c c c c 9 a 6 6 6 6
| h 6 a 4 k s 6 - - 0 r - - -
| a 4 4 m o c f o o
| a d b b d
| c s s
| o d d
| s
------------+------------------------------------
1.4-r3 | - + +
2.8.2 | + + + + + + + +
2.8.3-r1 | ~ + + + ~ + + +
2.10 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2.10-r1 | + + + ~ + ~ + +
2.10.1_pre0 | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Hope this is helpful to someone ;)
--
Tom Wesley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
eshowkw
Description: Binary data
pgpNM7WBJBiEj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
