Nah, that's fine.  Of course, that still leaves me with the option of
either Composite or DRI, never both together, as I have on my, now 5
year old computer with an equally elderly graphics card.

I was just adding that bit in for kicks.

Justin

On 7/1/05, Rafael Dantas de Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/1/05, Justin Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To counter this argument, I would point out that I don't normally
> > purchase used 3D acceleration hardware, and that by the time these
> > cards are "old" they will also be "obsolete," meaning that you will
> > have sunk a good amount of money into hardware that didn't work
> > properly for you until it was outdated.
> >
> > nVidia's drivers, on the other hand, have worked with brand new
> > hardware since I owned a Riva TNT (1998).  They continue to work.
> > Anybody with a new ATI card, however, has to choose a manner in which
> > they are going to cripple X.Org.  Do you want composite or DRI?
> > Before, the choice wasn't even an option.  Also, fglrxconfig output
> > bad xorg.conf files last I checked, because I had to hand-tune mine to
> > get the server working.
> 
> Obviously we´d all like to have our systems up and running as easily
> as possible, but I don´t think that "having to hand-tune" anything
> should be counted as a problem by any of us here... we use Gentoo
> after all, don´t we? ;-)
> 
> 
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On 7/1/05, Jens Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * On Friday 01 July 2005 01:49, Justin Hart wrote:
> > > > Buying an ATI card for a Linux box is not a good decision.  Go with
> > > > nVidia, at least their drivers work.  I've thought of buying an nVidia
> > > > card for this notebook for months because, frankly, ATI hasn't been
> > > > taking care of the matter, and won't in the forseeable future.
> > >
> > > There's two sides to every story. It is true that nVidia's drivers are 
> > > ahead
> > > of ATI's counterpart, especially on desktop computers. They seem to be 
> > > much
> > > more stable and mature, even while adding new features more quickly, i.e.
> > > support for Xorg's render and composite extensions.
> > >
> > > The situation concerning notebook-specific features is a bit like playing
> > > roulette. Most people want to use suspend to disk or suspend to RAM on 
> > > their
> > > quite expensive laptops, and it's both drivers who often fail miserably in
> > > that case, whether they are from nVidia or ATI. There are known 
> > > workarounds
> > > which might or might not get the stuff working, the chance of failure is
> > > high, depending on numerous other things like the driver for your
> > > framebuffered console and so on... Guess what? The open source drivers
> > > usually work, but do not offer 3D acceleration in many (ATI) or all 
> > > (nVidia)
> > > cases.
> > >
> > > Which brings us to another important point: Contrary to nVidia's 
> > > practice, ATI
> > > gives the specifications of older cards to the developer community. That's
> > > why there is an open source alternative for ATI's cards up to and includig
> > > the Radeon 9200 with working 3D acceleration support, and that's simply 
> > > why
> > > there is no real open source alternative for nVidia cards if you want to 
> > > use
> > > 3D applications on your box.
> > >
> > > Not that important? Well, while the ATI Mobility FireGL T2 in my IBM 
> > > laptop is
> > > not yet supported by open source drivers, it certainly will be in the 
> > > future.
> > > I wonder who's first in offering a 3D accelerated driver really supporting
> > > suspend to disk on my laptop: ATI or the guys from r300.sf.net. ;-)
> > >
> > > Now vice versa: The Geforce2 GTS in my desktop is quite ancient, but was 
> > > good
> > > enough to play around with Xorg's composite and render extensions to get 
> > > some
> > > solid eyecandy. Guess what? nVidia decided to not support those cards
> > > anymore, they now just get the most important bugfixes via some (yet to 
> > > come)
> > > "legacy drivers". Now that means a very little chance to have the new and
> > > still experimental stuff getting developed in my card's drivers in the
> > > future. Open source alternatives? None. See above.
> > >
> > > "Buying an ATI card for a Linux box is not a good decision." is too 
> > > general to
> > > be answered with "yes" or "no".
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jens
> > >
> > > --
> > > Reporter:   "What would you do if you found a million dollars?"
> > > Yogi Berra: "If the guy was poor, I would give it back."
> > > --
> > > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Justin W. Hart
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Rafael Dantas de Castro
> Engenharia de Computação 2001 - Unicamp
>  - Laboratório de Criptografia Aplicada
> 
> "Se procurar bem você acaba encontrando.
>  Não a explicação (duvidosa) da vida,
>  Mas a poesia (inexplicável) da vida."
> 
>        Carlos Drummond de Andrade
> 
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
> 


-- 
Justin W. Hart

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to