On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 08:08:30PM -0400, Robert G. Hays wrote: > 2) ... Unless you are using a new version of WhinedoZZZe (I forget what > you said you had) that claims to not need defragging ( I said 'claims', > if the new ones happen to make such a claim, and I'd keep my fingers > firmly crossed (hopeful/prayerful!). Anybody know about this? > wait... what? How come I've never heard about this? I am pretty sure that WinXP comes with the dreaded disk defragmenter. Unless you are speaking about server 2003, I don't think a "slightly reworked version of Win 2000 with NTFS" can claim that it doesn't need defragmenting.
W -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Address: 45 Spelman Hall, Princeton University 08544 * * Phone: x68958 AIM: AngularJerk * * E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: sep.dynalias.net * ---------------------------------------------------------------- "You should be excited by this, because it is an equation you can solve." ~DeathMech, S. Sondhi. P-town PHY 205 Sortir en Pantoufles: up 10 days, 10:36 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
