On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, W.Kenworthy wrote: > Better performance with reiserfs3 as well as peace of mind goes against > ext2/3 for me. As I said - YMMV - I have looked at my usage, number and > type of failures for both systems some time back and reiserfs3 came up > tops for me. You need to do the same: run both systems and see what is > best for your environment. I will move to reiserfs4 when there is some > consensus it it is getting stable as it has some nice features I like, > as well as the performance potential.
Performance is not the only metric to use when looking at an FS. Example: AFAIK, ReiserFS does not support quotas - so for my shared web server it is useless. -- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
