As I undertand openldap-2.2 is hard masked because of problem whith upgrade from 2.1. That's OK, but if I want to use 2.2 version originally or agreed to backup/restore database I can unmask it in package.unmask.
And here is another problem: all 2.2 ebuilds have ~x86 keyword - is it because they are assumed to be unstable yet or they have ~x86 because of upgrade problem? If second - then why there is need to double mask it? ~x86 is for unstable versions and if I want to use 2.2 - I want to know which versions of it are stable in portage and which are not.
---- Alexander Zubkov -- [email protected] mailing list
