Hello, our portage policy includes a portage_ro_role interface to allow read-only access to portage data. As usual with _role interfaces, according to the documentation the interface takes a role as the first ($1) and a type as the second argument ($2). However, the directives in the interface actually expect $1 to be a type.
So, we should either 1) replace $1 with $2 inside the interface, or 2) rename the interface to something without _role and fix the documentation. Regards, Luis Ressel
