Hi, I'm using just hardened/linux/amd64. Regards, Peter
2013/1/27 Alexander Tsoy <alexan...@tsoy.me> > On вс 27 янв 2013 18:32:19 MSK, Anthony G. Basile < > bas...@opensource.dyc.edu> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > The number of profiles in gentoo is growing *again* with the addition of > > release 13.0 profiles. Because of the way stacking works, adding these > > to hardened means a repetition of code in a way that is not good. I'll > > decide how to proceed in a week or so, let everyone know and then > > implement something. Right now I'm leaning towards "test" profiles for > > amd64 and x86 and after some good period of testing (6 months?) just > > switch all of hardened from 10.0 to 13.0. > > > > While I'm at the business of rethinking the profiles, I've been > > wondering, does anyone use the /desktop, /developer, /server sub > > profiles? I've officially only listed the following > > > > [18] hardened/linux/amd64 * > > [19] hardened/linux/amd64/selinux > > [20] hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib > > [21] hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux > > > > for amd64, and similarly for other arches. But there also exist > > profiles like: > > > > hardened/linux/amd64/desktop > > hardened/linux/amd64/developer > > hardened/linux/amd64/server > > > > for ia64, ppc, ppc64 and x86. I didn't even bother to add these for > > mips or arm. These are not listed in profiles.desc, so you can't > > eselect them, but a user could manually create those links. > > > > If no one is using them, I'll mark them deprecated, and dump them in a > > month or two. > > > > Comments? > > I've never used these subprofiles. > > -- > Alexander Tsoy > >