On 06/11/2012 01:20 AM, Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón wrote:
On 11/06/12 04:26, Jens Kasten wrote:
Am 2012-06-08 22:32, schrieb Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón:
On 08/06/12 21:40, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:06:37 +0300
Alex Efros wrote:
Actually, I see no reasons to NOT use hardened on desktops.
Maybe many more would if there was an easy and quick to install and
maintain compiled distro. More users more compatibility too, I'd guess.
Not suggesting there should be, just stating a reality.
Anyone know why hardened debian and was it adamantix died off?
Hardened debian had to change their name by adamantix because debian
forbid the use of his name.
It dissapeared because hardened gentoo appeared, and one distro
maintained by one user (Peter Busser) is a hard and crazy task.
Hmm because gentoo hardened? I am not sure about that.
Adamantix was RSBAC specific not grsecurity or SELinux.
I switch to gentoo hardened after adamantix was not maintained anymore.
Hi Jens, Yes, I'm sure, the main goal of adamantix was to create a
distribution with PIE and SSP to use over a rsbac kernel, goal that made
hardened gentoo later.
At the beginning rsbac was supported in gentoo and maintained by Kang.
I'm supporting it again.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
