I was lucky to hit this one: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400613
Regards: Dw. -- dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 2012.Január 26.(Cs) 02:15 időpontban "Tóth Attila" ezt írta: > I'm sorry for being offtopic, but this is the list I can rely on. > I've just upgraded openrc from 0.9.4 to 0.9.8.2 and my server went > offline. > After struggling with the remote console, it turned out, that the new > openrc system incorrectly builds up my bonding config. It assigns the IP > address to the eth1 interface and bonding stands there without an IP. In > addition it also fails to define routes properly. > > WHAT? I don't know how many of us will spend significant amount of time > with it, but that's too much for me. > > I see, that conf.d/network took over conf.d/net. My bonding config is > simple as my finger. > > Here is my regular net syntax: > config_eth0=( "null" ) > config_eth1=( "null" ) > RC_NEED_eth0="net.bond0" > config_bond0="<myip> netmask 255.255.255.192 brd <mybroadcast>" > routes_bond0="default gw <mygateway>" > dns_domain="mydomain" > > It works fine, it prevents eth interfaces getting IP and sets bond0 and > route perfectly. > > That would be the network syntax: > defaultroute="gw <mygateway>" > ip_bond0="<myiip>/26" > defaultiproute="via <mygateway>" > ifup_bond0="ifenslave bond0 eth0 eth1" > > It sucks. > Is there a working simple bonding example? > > Please let me know where I can ask for proper help. Gentoo install still > talks about net. Is there a document on how to set up bonding with the new > network config syntax? > > Ridiculous: > Dwokfur > -- > dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 > Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 > > >
