Dear Blueness, Thanks for your response. There were quite some outdated ebuilds and abandoned dependencies amongst the involved packages. However there were some mentionable, like vixie-cron or portmap. Fortunately my gcc-config is correct. The symptoms popped up probably because I don't recompile system or world. I let the system roll and rely on revdep-rebuild for consistency.
Probably the latest glibc stopped exporting some obsolete symbols. Actually I'm happy, that it pointed on some elderly packages of my systems older than 5 years now. Constantly hardened! Regards: Dw. Attila is my firstname. Hungary is big-endian regarding name ordering... :) Or simply call me Dwokfur. -- dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057 2011.Február 10.(Cs) 16:27 időpontban Anthony G. Basile ezt írta: > Hi Toth, > > You're getting that error because you have something compiled with > gcc-3. Make sure you're using gcc-4.4.4-r2 with the hardened specs. If > you do gcc-config -l, you should see something like this: > > blueness@whiteness ~ $ gcc-config -l > [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.4 * > [2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.4-hardenednopie > [3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.4-hardenednopiessp > [4] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.4-hardenednossp > [5] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.4-vanilla > > We're not supporting hardening on gcc-3 anymore. > > On 02/10/2011 07:17 AM, "Tóth Attila" wrote: >> Some binaries are failing since the last glibc upgrade like this: >> - >> binaryname: relocation error: binaryname: symbol __guard, version >> GLIBC_2.3.2 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference >> - >> I'm actually surprised how well my machines doing despite this problem. >> >> For those who have the same problem, you can search for affected >> binaries >> using this command: >> - >> scanelf -qRs __guard /bin /lib /sbin /usr/bin /usr/lib /usr/sbin /opt >> /var/www/ >> - >> >> - >> equery belongs path/binary >> - >> command can be used to query for which package the binary belongs to. >> >> Can somebody update me on the nature of the problem? Is it an intended >> movement to drop __guard? I know, that it's obsolete. I would suggest to >> communicate this in an enews or whatever for all hardened users. Or I >> may >> be the only one, who rolls the system without regular world recompiles? >> >> Regards: >> Dwokfur > > > -- > Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. > Gentoo Developer > >
