2009/6/26 Ed W <li...@wildgooses.com>:
> klondike wrote:
>>
>>> Apologies for replying to my own post, but I just realised that you
>>> were posing the question in the context of klondike's blog post. I do
>>> not know what the status of SSP is in the overlays and/or experimental
>>> toolchains so I'll bow out and leave it to one of the toolchain gurus
>>> to provide a credible response. My answer applies to the gcc ebuild in
>>> the mainline tree.
>>
>> Although I may be wrong, AFAIK SSP works nice with almost anything except
>> libstdc++, also packages which need it to be disabled (ie thunderbird)
>> usually do it without a problem of after pattching a bit the ebuild. Anyway,
>> I think the best one to answer is Zorry or Xake as they maintain it.
>
> So the Xake overlay is GCC 4.3.2 with the GCC 4 SSP enabled?
Mainly I could say it is.

> My limited understanding is that the GCC 4 (new) SSP implementation should
> be relatively benign and supported already by a modern toolchain with no
> further patches?  I would naively assume that since Redhat (and others) seem
> to be building their distros with it turned on that most packages would
> already be largely patched upstream to cope with it?  (certainly I am more
> interested in server packages than desktop packages)
I think Ubuntu has enabled it too. But I don't know how well or bad
are packages usually supported upstream.. I have run an apache2 server
and a verlihub server with the toolchain without issues, but I can't
gurantee you nothing as the server still hasn't had heavy load.

>> Anyway, at least on the overlay uclibc is still not supported :(
>> http://github.com/Xake/toolchain-overlay/blob/54581c25b74be5a5dc3d8c1de61dba55db7c639f/README
>
> Does Xake hang out here?  Curious as to what the issues will be found in
> uclibc.  I'm not specially tied to uclibc, just that it seems to work nicely
> so far and I'm not desperately tight on drive space...
I don't know the reasons for uclibc being not supported, but I think
it was because of some compilation problems. (Can't find the tickets,
sorry).

Reply via email to