On 15/07/2024 04.39, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 7/10/24 11:38 PM, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote:On 2024-07-10 09:19, Florian Schmaus wrote:From: Florian Schmaus <f...@gentoo.org>Add a new eclass for dev-util/rebar:3, based on the work of Anna Vyalkova in ::guru (thanks!).There's also rebar3.eclass in lanodanOverlay, hereby CC-ing Haelwenn on this.The Erlang/OTP ecosystem is moving to Rebar3. Upstreams start to drop support for Rebar2, or at least consider it.I can't find the first part of this email thread, including the actual submission of the eclass for review to the mailing list. Was this a private conversation?
No it wasn't a private conversation. But unfortunately I've used the wrong 'from' address, my personal one instead of the @gentoo.org address, so the mails did not went through. However, I didn't notice it, since the mails appeared in my inbox (due to me being CC'ed).
I'll resend the patchset again, probably the first thing I'll do tomorrow. Sorry for the inconvenience.
I notice that it *has* been committed by Flow to ::gentoo already, and your request for Haelwenn's feedback hasn't yet been answered.
I looked at the rebar3.eclass from the lanodanOverlay before pushing the new eclass, there seem to be no relevant differences from the one in ::guru/::gentoo. Judging from the commit history of rebar3.eclass in lanodanOverlay and in ::guru, it appears that the one in ::guru used lanodanOverlay's rebar3.eclass as starting point.
- Flow
OpenPGP_0x8CAC2A9678548E35.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
