On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 16:00 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 12/05/2024 20.21, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 19:22 +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> > > On 12/05/2024 04.26, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > + if [[ ${PKGBUMPING} != ${PVR} ]]; then
> > > > + pushd "${DISTDIR}" >/dev/null || die
> > > > +
> > > > + ebegin "Unpacking crates"
> > > > + printf '%s\0' "${crates[@]}" |
> > > > + xargs -0 -P "$(makeopts_jobs)" -n 1 -- \
> > >
> > > Consider using get_makeopts_jobs instead of makeopts_jobs, as it
> > > searches more variables for --jobs.
> >
> > Whose bright idea was to add a second similarly named function that does
> > roughly the same thing but apparently differently? It can hardly get
> > more confusing.
>
> You are absolutely right, it sucks that we have two very similar methods.
>
> You are invited to suggest how the situation can be improved. However,
> rambling without presenting alternatives is not helpful in any way.
> My suggestion would be for the person who introduced new methods and implicitly claimed the old methods to be "legacy" to put an actual effort to migrate consumers. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
