>>>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023, Florian Schmaus wrote: > Some, including me, consider timestamps without timezone specifiers to > be in local time (either of the consumer or producer of the > timestamp). Hence, if you really must have UTC here, then at least > consider making it explicit my requiring the 'Z' timezone specifier > (which, if you want to be ISO compatible, probably means that the > timestamp must include HH:MM too).
How about converting package.mask to XML? The xs:date type would allow a date followed by a time zone [1]. /me hides [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#deviantformats
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
