On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:47 PM TOMAS FABRIZIO ORSI <to...@fi.uba.ar> wrote: > I had not considered that possibility either. In that case, could not the > overlay > dependency resolution be handled as a module? > Said module could be a common interface for different package managers. > Then, the execution of said module would be handled on a per package > manager/sync program basis?
I'm not quite certain what you mean by "module" here, but that sounds like unnecessary extra abstraction. I think flow's idea to make the sync command configurable somehow would be sufficient, assuming there is demand for it.
