> On 27 Jan 2023, at 20:15, Michal Prívozník <mpriv...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 1/27/23 20:21, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Fri, 2023-01-27 at 10:51 -0800, A Schenck wrote: >>> On 1/27/23 09:36, Michał Górny wrote: >>>> # Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> (2023-01-27) >>>> # GKrellM and a variety of plugins. It's unmaintained for some >>>> time. >>>> # Upstream homepage is gone, and the whole suite is collecting dust >>>> # and patches. >>>> # Removal on 2023-02-26. Bug #892251. >>>> >>>> [also eclass/gkrellm-plugin.eclass] >>>> >>>> app-admin/gkrellm >>>> x11-plugins/gkrelltop >>> >>> The old homepage listed in the ebuild is gone but has moved[0]. >>> >>> The live ebuild has the correct upstream repository so it seems like >>> >>> just an oversight to not update the homepage whenever that was >>> >>> changed. >> >> Thanks. Unfortunately, it only confirms what I've suspected: it's not >> maintained and nobody's working on a GTK+3 port [1]. >> >> [1] https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm/issues/1 >> > > Yes, sadly, Bill passed away more than a year ago: > > https://mailproc.sbbsnet.net/list/gkre...@lists.netservicesgroup.com?cmd=user_listview_msg&domainid=40&list=gkrellm&msg_idx=28 > > But are you saying that if there was a GTK-3 support, then gkrellm could > stay? >
Yes. And ideally a maintainer in Gentoo.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
