On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 14:28 +0100, Volkmar W. Pogatzki wrote: > > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> hat am 25.11.2022 14:16 CET > > geschrieben: > > > > > > On Fri, 2022-11-25 at 10:04 +0100, Volkmar W. Pogatzki wrote: > > > > This doesn't seem consistent. How is it supposed to work? > > > > You didn't answer this question. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Michał Górny > > Sorry. I have to admit I have no idea how remote-id works and what's > needed to make a new remote-id work. > > I was asked on https://bugs.gentoo.org/882351 to post here, so I did. > > What did you mean with »doesn't seem consistent«, > why should an "apache" remote-id not be possible?
Let me rephrase the question: what will be the remote-id values for these packages? How can you handle the case when some of the packages are at top level of the domain, while others are in subpage? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
