Hey, > > How would you suggest we track who has commit access, etc? The same > way we do with developers, via a developer bug?
I believe proxy maintainers already have a bug assigned to them (at least I have one), so maybe just a comment or a special tag would be suffient on these bugs to signify commit access. > > I ask because I've noticed a lot of inactive proxied maintainers—one > of which had been listed in metadata.xml for 6 years but had never > committed to ::gentoo. > Should these packages not be dropped to maintainer needed? Just like regular developers, wouldn't it be reasonable to expect a minimal level of activiy from proxied maintainers (even if not as strict) or otherwise be dropped from a package? Zoltan
