> On 4 Jan 2022, at 00:29, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 21:29 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
>> 
>> Perhaps the 'pam' example was extreme, but ipv6, or threads as Sam
>> shared, does not make sense to be togglable.
>> 
> 
> Many packages need their ipv6 code disabled if the kernel has no ipv6
> support, and enabling ipv6 in the kernel is a pointless security risk
> for pretty much anyone in the United States.
> 

Obviously for such cases, the flag should be kept. But that's not
the case for plenty of packages.

Best,
sam

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to