> On 4 Jan 2022, at 00:29, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 21:29 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: >> >> Perhaps the 'pam' example was extreme, but ipv6, or threads as Sam >> shared, does not make sense to be togglable. >> > > Many packages need their ipv6 code disabled if the kernel has no ipv6 > support, and enabling ipv6 in the kernel is a pointless security risk > for pretty much anyone in the United States. >
Obviously for such cases, the flag should be kept. But that's not the case for plenty of packages. Best, sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP