>>>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2021, Roy Bamford wrote: > I'm in the "if it's not broken don't fix it" school.
+1 I don't see a strong argument to remove SHA512, so leave things as they are for now. We can reiterate when there are indications that SHA512 would be broken. (Then again, the same applies to BLAKE2B.) Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
