> On 14 Jul 2021, at 13:43, Marek Szuba <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2021-07-14 13:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> Shouldn't virtual/fortran go into BDEPEND in EAPIs 7 and 8? > > Good point! I've created https://bugs.gentoo.org/802153 so that we do not > lose track of this, that said it is beyond the scope of the issue at hand > (the eclass will not behave any differently here under EAPI 8 than it does > under EAPI 7) so I'll leave my current patch as it is. >
But to introduce a fix, isn't it a _lot_ easier to do it at the point of a new EAPI? What's the rush to add it if we're not ensuring we're using the new features correctly?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
