>>>>> On Mon, 07 Sep 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > + <li> > + If the virtual is being removed along with its second to last > + provider, include the virtual in the last-rites mail. However, please
Maybe write "any of its providers" instead of "its second to last provider"? It is simpler and still has the same meaning. > + do not include it in the <c>package.mask</c> entry as users do not need > + to be forced to proactively unmerge it. Instead, add it > + to <c>package.deprecated</c> to warn developers not to depend on it. > + Wait the time appropriate for the last rites. > + </li>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
