On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:47:52PM +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 13:51:41 -0500 > William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > All, > > > > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on > > new systems from eudev to udev. > > > > This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current systems since > > they have to migrate manually. Also, this change can be overridden at > > the profile level if some profile needs eudev (the last time I > > checked, this applies to non-glibc configurations). > > > > What do people think? > > No opinion on which to choose, I use the default one at the time I do > an install and have been happy with both. > > My main concern is that since the change won't be "live" until a > switched virtual reaches stable, eudev will still be much better tested > in our environment at this point, and people might uncover corner cases > when it's too late. Maybe a compromise could be to provide and > primarily advertise udev stages before making the switch ?
Creating udev stages would require a separate profile which would be removed once we did the default switch, so I'm not sure if we want to go that route. Does anyone remember if we did this for the original eudev switch? If we did, I am open to doing it again, but I honestly don't recall. All of the providers are stable currently, so my thought is a tracker + newsitem with a delay before switching the default. I'm thinking about a 30 day test window where we ask people to migrate their systems and if they find issues open bugs that block the tracker. Thoughts? William
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
