Am July 8, 2020 2:57:57 AM UTC schrieb Max Magorsch <arz...@gentoo.org>: >Hi all, > >I am glad to announce further progress at packages.gentoo.org (pgo in >the following). Compared to previous work during the last months, >which mostly addressed the back end, the new changes are rather >comprehensive. That's why I am looking forward to feedback here. > >So the tl;dr is that the new pgo version now displays: > - dependencies > - reverse dependencies > - pkgcheck results > - repology.org data > - github pull requests > - stabilization bugs > - keywording bugs > - security bugs > - general bugs >for each package. > >Additionally, there are new sites for all package maintainers, that is: > - Gentoo Projects (e.g. pyt...@gentoo.org) > - Gentoo Developers (e.g. la...@gentoo.org > - Proxied Maintainers (e.g. la...@the-cow.de) > >The maintainer's sites contain: > - all packages of the maintainer > - all outdated packages (according to repology) > - all related pull requests > - all related bugs (general, keywording and stabilization) > - all security bugs > - the changelog of all maintained packages >You will find the new sites under the 'Maintainers' tab. > >The overall appearance of the site has also slightly changed to >display all of the new information. > >Currently, the new version is deployed to: > > https://packagestest.gentoo.org/ > >Everyone is welcome to take a look around and tell me whether you >consider the new information as useful for your workflow and/or what >you would still change. > >I'm looking forward to your feedback. > >-M
Hey Max! Thank you very much for your work on p.g.o. I really like it, especially all this nice information for package maintainers. One thing I noticed when searching for the packages of a certain maintainer. It always lists some packages first which are not related to that maintainer. I tried a few different searches and this seems to happen all the time. Probably it is due @gentoo.org as all the unrelated packages contain gentoo in their names. However this differs from search to search. Ignoring this false positives the actual matching results seem complete. Omitting the domain also does not work and only lists unrelated packages in my case. When navigating to the maintained packages using the maintainer tab the list is correct. Just want to let you know and thanks again! -- Best regards Daniel
